Louis V. Gerstner Jr Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Louis V. Gerstner Jr - Research Paper Example Question is: Is leadership is different from management? Since the answer is yes, was Gerstner an effective leader? In his book â€Å" Elephants Can’t Dance â€Å", Gerstner during his first day at IBM stated the following â€Å" I’d like to say to all of you is that the last thing IBM needs right now is a vision†¦what IBM needs right now is a series of very tough-minded, market driven, highly effective strategies for each of its businesses† (Gerstner, 2002, p.68). After his speech, he began putting his hands on the dirty job which included letting go of no less than thousands of employees. He was serious about the business of keeping IBM afloat and popularity of his decisions was the least of his concerns. IBM learned a painful lesson in management and leadership from Gertsner but it was able to go back to its feet and survive tougher circumstances like the recession today. A study published in the journal Industrial Management identified practical qualities of effective leaders. Gerstner has at least two practical qualities that made him an effective leader, namely: â€Å"lead by example and read situations and people well â€Å"( qtd. from Enterprenuer.com). Gerstner employed these three practical qualities when he read IBM’s situation clearly because he knew what has to be done despite the surmounting odds way back then. This is not definitely pure luck as this quality was honed by years of experience at a previous company – American Express. It is possible that good instincts and lessons learned from mistakes developed Gertner’s keen observation of situations and people in a business environment. When he was hired as consultant for the fledgling Sony, Gerstner again read the situation as he said†   "The cultural issues, as I found at IBM, are the most fundamental, the most difficult."( Gunther, cnnmoney ,2006) In shor t, he mentored Stringer through

Presidential and Congressional Relationship Essay

Presidential and Congressional Relationship - Essay Example Influence includes the swaying ability especially of the leaders. The effect of a leader accompanies the leader’s ability to possess impacts on characters, progress or act of population or things and the impacts themselves. The success relates to the influence closely to determine the presidential authority. The differences between success and influence are critical for determination since the two aspects depends on each other. Among the populations in America and numerous parts of the world, influence normally comes after success. The president can only be considered successful after a series of accomplishments. This leaves the success as an evident factor based on the physical attainments of development. Success bears effects of creating the popularity in a leader and the rest of the congressional members would wish to associate with successful president. The preference of association with success is a common feature amongst the human. The character on the quest for success is borne amidst the human conscience with a notion that success is the only means of gaining authority. Success entails a number of elements for its merit and completion. Success is a virtue that lies in a leader’s intrapersonal traits. ... The success can attain man achievement with the involvement of flexibility in leadership. The agreement amongst the president, congress and the senate results into leadership success. Unlike success, influence operates on the impact. The outstanding difference between success and influence depends on the span through which each is accomplished and the necessities. Influence lies in the population reasoning on the president. The members of population include the legislature and the public at in unison. The president can prove of being influential after meriting the population and the fellow leaders gauging. America remains a significant country in the global scope since its leadership and the political systems are worlds concerns. Therefore, the influence of the American president is as well as the global influence. Influence determines the president’s authority and the ability to succeed in the legislative decisions. The above descriptions render the influence as a dependent f actor on success. Thus, success can result solely in the absence of influence contributing to their dissimilarity. Influence result from the people’s perceptions to the president. Influence also occurs as a result of the success. A critical question can emanate from the fact that a leader can be successful but not influential. The answer to this question lies on the differences between success and influence and the requirements of each. Success can result from the president’s achievement in only one 2perspective maybe triggering fundamental developments in the country. Influence demands more than a unidirectional achievement and can be attained through winning the confidence of the public and